Legal Opinion
McMahan v. Toto
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 6, 2002No. Nos. 00-10323, 00-14728PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and HAND *, District Judge. CARNES, Circuit Judge:
Recent events in this case illustrate that “when we write to a state law issue, we write in faint and disappearing ink.” Sultenfuss v. Snow, 35 F.3d 1494, 1504 (11th Cir.1994) (en banc) (Carnes, J., dissenting). The disappearing ink here is that which we used in our previous opinion in this case to express our holding about whether the *1080Florida Supreme Court would apply its offer of judgment statute, Fla. Stat. § 768.79, in a case tried in Florida but for which the substantive…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pardo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Huddleston v. DwyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. PalmaSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- TGI Friday's, Inc. v. DvorakSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Schmidt v. FortnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Montgomery Blair Sibley v. Maxine Cohen LandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Jonah P. Anders, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Hometown Mortgage Services, Inc., Mortgage Brokers Group of TuscaloosaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Schwartz v. Millon Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Tywan HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Jones v. United Space Alliance, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.