Legal Opinion
Aikens v. Ludlum
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided March 1, 1994No. 9210SC1304PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Judge.
By this appeal we are asked to interpret the provisions of an Offer of Judgment made pursuant to Rule 68 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. There is no dispute between the parties as to the underlying facts, only as to the effect of defendants’ Offer of Judgment. On 15 October 1992, defendants served plaintiff with an Offer of Judgment which stated:
Defendants, pursuant to G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 68, more than ten days before trial, offers [sic] to allow judgment to be taken against them in this action in the amount of $10,001.00 for all damages and attorney’s fees taxable…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Scallon v. HooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Purdy v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Evans v. Full Circle Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Estate of Wells Ex Rel. Morley v. TomsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- David Wichnoski, O.D., P.A. v. Piedmont Fire Prot. Sys.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Craighead v. Carrols Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Harward v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.