Legal Opinion

Purdy v. Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1982No. 243PA82PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

The issue dispositive of this appeal is whether an offer of judgment for $5,001, together with all costs accrued except attorneys’ fees, complies with the requirements for a valid offer under Rule 68 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

Rule 68 provides, in pertinent part, that “a party defending against a claim may serve upon the adverse party an offer to allow judgment to be taken against him for the money or property or to the effect specified in his offer, with costs then accrued.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 68. (Emphasis added.) The Rule further provides that if the offer is not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Scheriff v. BeckDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1978
  5. Bob Coop and Rhonda Coop v. City of South Bend, David Shock and Vincent LauritaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Poole v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Braunberger v. Interstate Engineering, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Huff v. ChrismonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Aikens v. LudlumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Lincoln v. BuecheCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API