Legal Opinion

Marich v. Knox County Department of Human Services/Children Services Unit

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1989No. 88-1899PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

R.C. 2725.01 provides that “[w]hoever is * * * entitled to the custody of another, of which such custody such person is unlawfully deprived, may prosecute a writ of habeas corpus * *

Appellee alleges that she was unlawfully deprived of her daughter when she signed a permanent surrender agreement in response to undue pressure. Appellee filed a petition *165for a writ of habeas corpus in which she seeks the return of her child.

In other permanent surrender cases, such as Morrow v. Family & Community Serv. of Catholic Charities, Inc. (1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 247, 28 OBR 327, 504 N.E. 2d 2, and Manning…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State ex rel. Commercial Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State ex rel. Liberty Mills, Inc. v. LockerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Linger v. WeissOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In re MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Howard v. Catholic Social Services of Cuyahoga County, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In re Adoption of ZschachOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Rispo Realty & Development Co. v. City of ParmaOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Howard v. Catholic Social Serv. of Cuyahoga Cty., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API