Legal Opinion

Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1986No. 86-120PublishedCited by 171 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

The question presented in this appeal centers on whether the Motor Vehicle Dealers Board, by granting a motion for rehearing and reconsideration of an earlier order before a court appeal is filed and prior to expiration of the statutory fifteen-day appeal period, retains jurisdiction to rehear the cause and thereafter issue a reconsidered decision after the appeal period has expired.8

Ford argues that the board’s March 30 order was final and that the protesting dealers ignored their exclusive remedy of judicial appeal. Ford contends that the board’s reconsidered decision, which was not…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Lester v. LeuckOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State Ex Rel. Herbert v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sloss-sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by171 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court · 2005

166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API