Pegan v. Crawmer
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Pegan asserts that the court of appeals erred in denying the writ of habeas corpus. The court of appeals determined that the domestic relations court retained continuing jurisdiction over the custody issues, that Pegan’s appeal was pending before the court of appeals regarding the domestic relations court’s custody award, and that Pegan had failed to demonstrate that she has no adequate remedy at law.
A writ of habeas corpus lies in certain extraordinary circumstances where there is an unlawful restraint of a person’s liberty and there is no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Neff v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Gaskins v. ShiplevyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Newton v. Court of ClaimsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- In re HuntOhio Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Pratts v. HurleyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Hernandez v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Watkins v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Johnson v. Timmerman-CooperOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Rock v. School Emp. Retirement Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.