Legal Opinion

Rispo Realty & Development Co. v. City of Parma

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1990No. 89-1514PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

Parma asserts that, as a noncharter municipality and under powers it claims to possess pursuant to the “home rule” provision of Section 3, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution, it has the authority to enact zoning ordinances that are irreconcilable with the statutory scheme adopted by the state. For the reasons that follow, we hold that a noncharter municipality may not adopt a zoning ordinance that contains automatic referendum and ward veto provisions since those provisions are in direct conflict with R.C. 713.12 and 731.29.

The applicable constitutional provisions that delineate powers…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Canton v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Village of West Jefferson v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Garcia v. Siffrin Residential Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Fondessy Enterprises, Inc. v. City of OregonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Marich v. Knox County Department of Human Services/Children Services UnitOhio Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. City of Cuyahoga FallsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. City of Dayton v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. City of Cuyahoga FallsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API