Legal Opinion

In re Adoption of Zschach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1996No. Nos. 94-2752 and 95-170PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

I

This court has already determined that in order to contest an adoption, “a putative father who has signed the birth certificate of a child must file a written objection to the adoption with the court, Department of Human Services, or the agency having custody of the ehild[.]” In re Adoption of Greer (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 293, 638 N.E.2d 999, paragraph three of the syllabus. In this case, we determine that a putative father’s attempt to condition his consent to adoption upon his retention of permanent visitation rights is not the equivalent of a written objection as required under R.C.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. In Re the Guardianship of K.H.O.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re B.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Kaylor v. BrueningOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In re K.W., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Highland County2018

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API