Bird v. Connecticut Power Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtWyk’S'e, J.
The plaintiff instituted this action to recover pension payments alleged to be due from the defendants. Upon the trial of the case to the jury, the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff has appealed, assigning as error the direction of the verdict, the refusal to set it aside, and certain rulings on evidence which, in the view we take of the case, have become academic.
Considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the evidence would have justified the jury in finding the following facts: The defendant Hartford Electric Light Company, hereinafter called…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Menke v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Forrish v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Wilson v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934
- Tilbert v. Eagle Lock Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Mabley & Carew Co. v. BordenOhio Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Russell v. Princeton Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Babiarz v. Hartford Special, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Dolak v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- James Wyper, Jr. v. Providence Washington Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.