Legal Opinion

Forrish v. Kennedy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1954No. Appeal, 338PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chibsey,

This appeal arises out of an action in equity tried upon a case stated to compel the trustees of the Anthracite Health and Welfare Fund to pay the plaintiff a retirement pension out of the fund.

The relevant facts as agreed to by the parties are as follows: In 1909 the plaintiff, Vincent Forrish, a miner in the anthracite coal industry in Pennsylvania, became a member of the United Mine Workers of America, District 1, after he fulfilled the necessary qualifications and paid the required initiation fee. From that time until the present he has continuously…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Damiani v. LobascoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Diskin v. Philadelphia Police Pension Fund Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Brown's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Horace Eugene Bayles v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Hurd v. Illinois Bell Telephone CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1955
  3. Russell v. Princeton Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  4. Boase v. Lee Rubber & Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. Siegel v. First Pennsylvania Banking and Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API