Mabley & Carew Co. v. Borden
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
It is contended by the Mabley & Carew Company that there is no proof of the designation of Ida C. Borden as beneficiary under the certificate in question.
The name appears on the back of the certificate and, while it is typewritten, it is certainly a sufficient designation, taken in connection with the fact that Anna Work had it in her possession until her death.
There is just one question in this case, and that is the consideration for the issuance of this certificate. It is true that Anna Work could not maintain an action on this certificate in her lifetime, as no right of action existed in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Zwolanek v. Baker Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bolling v. Clevepak Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Spooner v. Reserve Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Chinn v. China National Aviation Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hobson v. EatonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.