Tilbert v. Eagle Lock Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The crucial question reserved is whether the demurrer to the amended complaint should be sustained, it being stipulated that if the facts" alleged entitle the plaintiff to recover, judgment shall be rendered accordingly. The complaint as amended alleged, in substance, that the plaintiff’s husband, Kasimierz Tilbert, entered the employ of the defendant corporation prior to January 1st, 1922, and continued therein until his death on August 28th, 1931. On or about June 29th, 1923, the defendant cancelled the group insurance which covered the plaintiff’s intestate and issued a so-called…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cook v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
- Wellington v. ApthorpMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Tilton v. Sterling Coal & Coke Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1904
- State Ex Rel. Marsh v. LumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Gibbs v. DownsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Gaudio v. Griffin Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Anderson v. Douglas & Lomason Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Raymond Hoefel v. Atlas Tack Corporation, Raymond Mahoney v. Great Northern Industries, Inc., Atlas Tack CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.