Legal Opinion

Brill v. Christy

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1901No. Civil No. 705PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDoan, J.

An action was brought in the district court of Maricopa County by the appellee, as plaintiff, to recover the undivided one fourth of a band of cattle branded thus, CR, and for.an accounting by appellants (the defendants) of their dealings with said cattle, and for a division thereof, and the delivery to the appellee of his alleged undivided one-fourth interest therein. The complaint alleged that one William Roarke was the owner of an undivided one-fourth interest in a certain band of cattle, and that James Roarke, since deceased, was the owner of the remaining three-fourths interest; that-…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tome v. DuboisSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Tessmann v. Supreme Commandery of United FriendsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Nance v. Barber and JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. State v. BoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Cuerth v. ArbogastMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Shemwell v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  5. Webb v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API