Legal Opinion
Nance v. Barber and Jackson
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 25, 1894No. 791PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error from Hays. Tried below before Hon. H. Teichmueller.
1Opinion of the Court
KEY, Associate Justice.
Plaintiff in error J. M. Ranee brought this suit against BE. E. Barber and I. R. Jackson, defendants in error, to recover 116 head of cattle. The plaintiff claimed the cattle under a sale evidenced by the following written instruments:
“State of Texas, \
“County of Hays, j
“Know all men by these presents, that I have this day sold to J. M. Ranee one hundred and sixteen head of cattle of the following marks and brands: Brands ¿ and H X T, various marks; also four ponies, one brand LOR, one ‘S, two /1Yn The said cattle to be delivered on the 1st day of April next, and if any…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Albright-Pryor Co. v. Pacific Selling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Guedry v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Trigg v. BlakemoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Rone v. MartiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Brill v. ChristyArizona Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.