Legal Opinion

Tessmann v. Supreme Commandery of United Friends

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1894PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The; facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action is brought upon a relief-fund certificate issued by the defendant society to JosephineEiehstaedt, by the terms of which a sum not exceeding 81,000 is made payable, in case of death, to the plaintiff, who is the daughter of Mrs. Eiehstaedt. The plaintiff recovered a judgment for the amount named, with interest. The defenses interposed were, first, that proper proofs of' death were not furnished, the claim being that, after the-proofs were furnished, a demand for further proofs upon the subject of the birth of the deceased was made by. the-company. The second defense was that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. KimmellMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Hunt v. Supreme CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Washington Life Insurance v. HaneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. Owen v. BoyleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1838

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Traiser v. Commercial Travellers' Eastern Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Pollack v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  3. Sykes v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Brill v. ChristyArizona Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Billingsley v. HilesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API