Legal Opinion
Rich Vision Centers, Inc. v. Board of Medical Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 21, 1983No. Civ. 66031PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Rich Vision Centers, Inc. (Rich) and Terminal-Hudson Electronics, Inc. (Terminal-Hudson) appeal from an adverse judgment in their suit against the Board of Medical Examiners (Board) for the recovery of certain payments made pursuant to a negotiated settlement.
Because the Board, and therefore the attorneys representing it, had the power to settle the case upon reasonable conditions, we affirm the judgment.
Facts and Procedural Background
Rich and Terminal-Hudson were corporations doing business as dispensing opticians. In June 1975, they had a large number of contested matters…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
- People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Ferdig v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Fisher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Frankel v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Stermer v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Coastside Fishing Club v. California Resources AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.