Legal Opinion

Stermer v. Board of Dental Examiners

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 2002No. B146870PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.—

Introduction

Appellant David Stermer (Stermer), a licensed dentist, appeals from the trial court’s denial of a petition for writ of administrative mandate by which Stermer sought to set aside discipline imposed by respondent Board of Dental Examiners (Board).

Stermer had been convicted of Penal Code misdemeanor violations. While challenging the conviction by a petition for writ of habeas corpus and after unsuccessful efforts to continue the administrative hearing regarding proposed discipline by the Board, Stermer stipulated, in connection with the disciplinary proceeding, to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. SumstineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Lacy v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. In Re CrumptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Smith v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Frankel v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. JKH Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Neighbors in Support of Appropriate Land Use v. County of TuolumneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Lanigan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Parra v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Alhambra Police Officers Ass'n v. City of Alhambra Police DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API