Legal Opinion
Bruder v. Chu
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 17, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-1492PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Arthur Perry Bruder, an attorney representing himself, brought this action against Steven Chu, ■ in his official capacity as the Secretary of Energy for the United States Department of Energy (the “Department”), alleging discrimination on the basis of sex and age in violation of federal law. 1 The Department has filed a motion to dismiss Bruder’s claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Moore v. CastroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Kyle v. BedlionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Brooks v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Patzy v. HochbergDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Albert v. PerdueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.