Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 27, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2008-1747PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Herman Brewer and Fayette Reid, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, bring suit against their employer, the United States Marshals Service (“USMS” or “Defendant”). Plaintiffs allege that Defendant engaged in a pattern or practice of racial discrimination against them and other African American Deputy United States Marshals in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harrington v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Rivera v. Rosenberg & Associates, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Artis v. GreenspanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Jeffries v. LynchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. In re: Herman BrewerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API