Legal Opinion

Outdoor Services, Inc. v. Pabagold, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 1986No. A021667PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BARRY-DEAL, J.

Pabagold, Inc. (Pabagold), appeals from an order confirming an arbitration award and judgment in favor of Outdoor Services, Inc. (Outdoor Services). Pabagold argues that Outdoor Services was not a third party beneficiary of the contract between Pabagold and Mediasmith, an advertising agency, and therefore could not enforce the arbitration agreement contained in the contract. Pabagold also asserts that even if Outdoor Services was a third party beneficiary, it waived its rights under the arbitration agreement by filing a cross-complaint against Pabagold in an action…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Gilbert Financial Corp v. Steelform Contracting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Paulsen v. CNF INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Xavier v. Philip Morris USA Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
  4. Marsch v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Soderberg v. McKinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API