Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Pulliam

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1916No. 7267PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Cherokee County: John H. Pitehford, Judge. Action by M. Y. Pulliam against W. M. Kennedy. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RTJMMONS. C.

This action was commenced in a justice of the peace court of Cherokee county, by defendant in error, hereinafter stvled the plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter styled -the defendant. to recover for work and labor performed for defendant by plaintiff’s infant-son, under a parol contract between plaintiff and defendant. Upon appeal to the district court of Cherokee county plaintiff had judgment, and defendant brings this proceeding-in error to reverse said judgment.

It appears that the real name of the plaintiff is (lanzada Pulliam, and defendant’s first…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. VanderbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Walton v. KennamerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Huster v. WynnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Jennings Co. v. DyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Cochran Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Douthit v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Priest v. QuintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Bardwell v. Riverside Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Webb v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API