Priest v. Quinton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court, Sequoyah County; John H. Pitchford, Judge. Action by Ducy Quinton against John P. Priest. Defendant’s motion for continuance, denied, and verdict instructed for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.
The parties to this action will be designated as they appeared in the district court. The action was commenced in a justice of the peace court of Sequoyah county, by Lucy Quinton, to recover a judgment against the defendant, John P. Priest, upon a promissory note in the sum of $100. Answering the plaintiff's bill of particulars, the defendant admitted the execution of tire note, and as a defense thereto attempted to plead payment by the following allegations:
“Further answering, defendant states the facts to be: That Dave Quinton, the husband of this plaintiff, came to him and they entered…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kaufman v. BoismierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- James v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Walton v. KennamerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Elliott v. CoggswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rosen v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Whitney v. LowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. BolinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Posey v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927