Jennings Co. v. Dyer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Carter County; S. H. Russell, Judge. Action by the Jennings Company against Mamie Dyer, Frank Dyer, Salina Dyer, Eliza Dyer, L. D. Akers, Jimmie Speake, and Dow Taylor, administrator of the estate of A. W. Speake, deceased. From a judgment in favor of defendant Mamie Dyer, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
The errors assigned by plaintiff in error in its petition in error are as follows: (1) That the court erred in overruling plaintiff’s motion for a continuance; (2) that the judgment is contrary both to the law and the evidence; (3) that the court erred in rendering judgment against plaintiff and in favor of defendant Mamie Dyer.
Motion for a new trial was filed and overruled, to which plaintiff excepted. The action of the court, however, in overruling the motion for a new trial has not been assigned as error in plaintiff in error’s petition in error in this court, and, as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McCann v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Meyer v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- McMahan v. NorickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. DyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Cox v. LavineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Alva Roller Mills v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- In Re Guardianship of DeereSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Daugherty v. FelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron Works v. R. D. Cole Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.