Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Biglieri

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1978No. 9312PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the trial court had before it sufficient evidence to conclude as it did that respondent Biglieri, a licensed real estate broker, was the “procuring cause” of a series of leases in the Capitol Plaza office development in Carson City.

In late 1972, Biglieri entered into an oral contract with appellants Schneider and Jouflas, as S J Corp., under which Biglieri was to procure lessees for an office development then under construction in Carson City. Seeing the various agencies of the state government as ideal potential lessees, Biglieri then entered…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Havas v. CarterNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Allen v. WebbNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. LevertonNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Close v. RedeliusNevada Supreme Court · 1950

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flamingo Realty, Inc. v. Midwest Development, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Morrow v. BargerNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Binder v. Levy Realty Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Warrington v. EmpeyNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Flamingo Realty, Inc. v. Midwest Development, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API