Legal Opinion

Warrington v. Empey

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1979No. 8838PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On May 23, 1972, the owner of 210 acres of ranch property near Dayton, Nevada, entered into an exclusive written listing agreement with respondent Empey, a real estate broker. The agreement included a 10% broker’s commission to be paid to Empey in the event of a sale as a result of his efforts. This agreement was cancelled by the owner on November 30, 1972.

*138Respondent Turner was interested in buying ranch property and, accordingly, on November 28, 1972, he contacted appellant Huckins, a real estate broker employed by appellant James C. Warrington. Since a fellow salesman, appellant…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Milone & Tucci, Inc. v. Bona Fide Builders, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Richards v. KuppingerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Chandler v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Morgan v. Board of State LandsUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Smith v. Recrion CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Galardi v. Naples Polaris, L.L.C.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Acton v. Fullmer (In Re Fullmer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2005
  3. Tessema v. United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International UnionDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API