Legal Opinion

Binder v. Levy Realty Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1990No. 18950PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Sitting without a jury, the district court found there was an oral contract and/or implied contract between appellants and respondent and that respondent was the procuring cause for the sale of three brothels in Winnemucca, Nevada. Accordingly, the district court held that respondent was owed a real estate broker’s commission for the sale. On appeal, appellants argue respondent was not the procuring cause of the sale. We agree.

FACTS

In 1983, appellants, Sylvia Binder and her business associate Jack Thomas (aka Jack Quisler), were attempting to sell three brothels in Winnemucca, Nevada.…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrow v. BargerNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Shell Oil Company v. Ed Hoppe Realty Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Larson v. B.R. Enterprises, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Schneider v. BiglieriNevada Supreme Court · 1978

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Atwell v. Southwest SecuritiesNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Carrigan v. RyanNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Atwell v. Southwest SecuritiesNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Chan v. WuNevada Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Palmer v. Del Webb's High SierraNevada Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API