Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Halter

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1988No. C6-87-1094PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an action initiated for injunctive relief following the termination of a contract for deed. Appellants Alfred and Donna Hoffman claim the con tract could not be terminated following their failure to cure a default within the 60-day time limitation under Minn.Stat. § 559.21, subd. 2a (1986) because the notice of cancellation served upon them did not follow the proper statutory form. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1958 appellants Alfred and Donna Hoffman purchased and improved certain property in Blue Earth County, Minnesota. In April 1986, after…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Conley v. DowningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Karim v. WernerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Freitag v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gust v. Peoples and Enderlin State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Interfund Corp. v. O'BYRNECourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Sabes & Richman, Inc. v. MuenzerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. In re HaakeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012
  5. In re Edina Development Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API