Karim v. Werner
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
Haroon and Latiefa Karim (plaintiffs) appeal from an order for judgment adjudging plaintiffs in breach of a contract for deed (C/D-l) with Richard and Kathleen Werner (defendants). Plaintiffs are vendees in the contract for deed; defendants are vendors. We affirm.
In 1975, plaintiffs purchased commercial investment property (known as Newport Plaza) on a contract for deed basis from Wil-Mur Enterprises, Inc. (Wil-Mur). Wil-Mur assigned its vendor’s interest to defendant. Both plaintiffs and defendants were experienced and sophisticated in real estate investment.
In April 1978,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Tarpy v. NowickiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Karalis v. AgnewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Morrison v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
3Cited by11 opinions
- Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Bank Midwest, Minnesota, Iowa, N.A. v. LipetzkySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Outboard Marine Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Viereck v. Peoples Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hoffman v. HalterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.