Legal Opinion

Karim v. Werner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 27, 1983No. C5-81-1123PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Justice.

Haroon and Latiefa Karim (plaintiffs) appeal from an order for judgment adjudging plaintiffs in breach of a contract for deed (C/D-l) with Richard and Kathleen Werner (defendants). Plaintiffs are vendees in the contract for deed; defendants are vendors. We affirm.

In 1975, plaintiffs purchased commercial investment property (known as Newport Plaza) on a contract for deed basis from Wil-Mur Enterprises, Inc. (Wil-Mur). Wil-Mur assigned its vendor’s interest to defendant. Both plaintiffs and defendants were experienced and sophisticated in real estate investment.

In April 1978,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holiday Acres No. 3 v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Tarpy v. NowickiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Karalis v. AgnewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Morrison v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. General Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Bank Midwest, Minnesota, Iowa, N.A. v. LipetzkySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Outboard Marine Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Viereck v. Peoples Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Hoffman v. HalterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API