Legal Opinion

Gust v. Peoples and Enderlin State Bank

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1989No. Civ. 880378PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Justice.

Ben Gust appeals from a judgment holding him liable to Peoples and Enderlin State Bank [Bank] on a promissory note for $238,651.38. The Bank has cross-appealed from a part of the judgment which rescinded a settlement agreement, promissory note, and warranty deed, and quieted title to certain real property in Gust. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

In April 1984, Gust, an elderly farmer from Leonard, was approached by his nephew, James Nygard, who requested that Gust borrow sufficient funds from the Bank to allow Nygard to obtain an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ostlund Chemical Co. v. Norwest Bank of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. H & F HOGS v. HuweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Beachcomber Coins, Inc. v. BoskettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  5. Loraas v. ConnollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dorr v. Sacred Heart HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  2. Brunsoman v. ScarlettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Stabler v. First State Bank of RoscoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Volk v. Wisconsin Mortgage Assurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. First State Bank of New Rockford v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API