Legal Opinion

Interfund Corp. v. O'BYRNE

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 30, 1990No. C9-90-662PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

This case involves a promissory note relating to the sale of an Arabian horse. On appeal from the denial of his motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, Stuart O’Byrne argues the forum selection clause at issue is unreasonable, and absent his agreement to personal jurisdiction in Minnesota, there are insufficient minimum contacts to pass constitutional muster. We conclude the forum selection clause is reasonable and affirm.

FACTS

For financial reasons, O’Byrne purchased his business partner’s interest in a thoroughbred horse, Riskie Affair. His partner sold his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SzukhentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Full-Sight Contact Lens Corp. v. Soft Lenses, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. In Re State & Regents Building Asbestos CasesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alpha Systems Integration, Inc. v. Silicon Graphics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Polk County Recreational Ass'n v. Susquehanna Patriot Commercial Leasing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. TRWL Financial Establishment v. Select International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API