Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Tapo Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1956No. Civ. 21484PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiffs from an adverse judgment in an action to replace lost stock certificates for 5,000 shares of stock of defendant Tapo Oil Company, a California corporation, brought pursuant to section 2482 et seq. of the Corporations Code. The cause went to trial on the amended complaint of plaintiffs, called the “Stewart heirs,” the answer and cross-complaint of defendants other than Tapo Oil Company, called the “Conger heirs,” and the answer of plaintiffs to the cross-complaint. Tapo appeared as a stakeholder. Each side sought to have new certificates of stock issued to them…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carlson v. LindauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Young v. New Pedrara Onyx Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Kreling v. WalshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Gwin v. CalegarisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Ames v. Empire Star Mines Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. HornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. People v. Conagra Grocery Prods. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Dallman Co. v. Southern Heater Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API