Legal Opinion
Golob v. Nauman Vandervoort, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 28, 1972No. Civ. C-71-15PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DON J. YOUNG, District Judge:
This cause came to be heard on motion of the defendant for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant has filed a memorandum and reply memorandum in support thereof, although it did not seek leave of this Court to file the latter. Plaintiffs have filed a memorandum in opposition to the motion for summary judgment.
It is axiomatic that in a motion for summary judgment the Court must ascertain whether there is a genuine issue as to a material fact after viewing the record in a light most favorable to the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Richard Shemtob v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davis v. Avco CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1974
- Lange v. H. Hentz & Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1976
- Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill, Noyes v. BurchfieldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Kirkland v. EF Hutton and Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983
- Geyer v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1975