Lange v. H. Hentz & Co.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ROBERT W. PORTER, District Judge.
I. NATURE OF THE CONTROVERSY
Plaintiffs posit, among other theories of recovery, 1 that Defendant-broker-dealers have breached certain duties owed to them as prescribed by Article III, Sections 2, 13 and 18 2 of the National Association of Security Dealers’ [NASD] Rules of Fair Trade. Defendants have moved to dismiss all claims asserted against them which are bottomed upon a breach of those Rules. That motion is based upon an asserted absence of subject matter jurisdiction and a failure on the part of Plaintiffs to state a claim upon which…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- T. B. Harms Company v. Edward Eliscu and Ross Jungnickel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,030 Henry T. Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,321 Timothy L. Ford v. Hamilton Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Smith v. GrooverDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Rupert v. Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. LouisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Javitch v. First Montauk Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.