Legal Opinion

Lange v. H. Hentz & Co.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided September 9, 1976No. Civ. A. 3-74-139-FPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

ROBERT W. PORTER, District Judge.

I. NATURE OF THE CONTROVERSY

Plaintiffs posit, among other theories of recovery, 1 that Defendant-broker-dealers have breached certain duties owed to them as prescribed by Article III, Sections 2, 13 and 18 2 of the National Association of Security Dealers’ [NASD] Rules of Fair Trade. Defendants have moved to dismiss all claims asserted against them which are bottomed upon a breach of those Rules. That motion is based upon an asserted absence of subject matter jurisdiction and a failure on the part of Plaintiffs to state a claim upon which…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. T. B. Harms Company v. Edward Eliscu and Ross Jungnickel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  5. Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,030 Henry T. Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,321 Timothy L. Ford v. Hamilton Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Smith v. GrooverDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  4. Rupert v. Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. LouisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. Javitch v. First Montauk Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API