Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Caddy v. R. Maturi & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 14, 1944No. 33,679PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Certiorari upon the relation of Fred Caddy, employe, to review the action of the industrial commission in proceedings brought by him under the workmen’s compensation act against R. Maturi & Company, employer, and Employers Mutual Insurance Company, insurer, wherein it was determined that relator’s disability was not due to an accident arising out of or in the course of his employment.

In May 1942, relator was employed by R. Maturi & Company to operate a Diesel-powered caterpillar-tractor at the Majorka Mine about 22 miles from Hibbing. The tractor weighed from 18 to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Klika v. Independent School District No. 79Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Young v. Melrose Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. State ex rel. Puhlmann v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Farmers' State Savings Bank v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Hiber v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Balow v. Kellogg Cooperative Creamery AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. United Telephone and Telegraph Company v. CuliverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  5. Lehtinen v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API