Ream v. Barr
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MB. JUSTICE PLUMMER Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
Both the plaintiff and the parties defendant appeal from an order taxing costs in the above-entitled action. The plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion to strike out the cost bills filed by the defendants and the defendants appeal from the order of the court disallowing certain items in their cost bill, the order of the court disallowing only two items, to wit, $49.22, costs of tak ing the deposition of the defendant Monte S. Hemmy, and disallowing the sum of $100 attorneys’ fees to each one of the several defendants, being…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Irwin v. NewbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Smith v. McDermottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Leadbetter v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Welch v. AlcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Lindy v. McChesneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shell Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Gloria v. A. Colonia PortuguesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- City of Downey v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- City of Downey v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968