Legal Opinion

Welch v. Alcott

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1918No. L. A. No. 4618. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

By the judgment in this action the plaintiff recovered costs. He served and filed his memorandum in due time, whereupon the defendant moved to tax costs by striking out a number of items claimed. The court sustained the defendant’s objections to some of the items, but disallowed them as to others. From the order so made, in so far as it is unfavorable to him, the defendant appeals.

Whether or not plaintiff should have been allowed costs at all is a question that is discussed to some extent in the briefs. It does not arise on this appeal, but may be presented for consideration on the appeal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Lindy v. McChesneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fellowship of Humanity v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Moss v. Underwriters' Report, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Posey v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Murphy v. F. D. Cornell Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Hoge v. Lava Cap Gold Mining Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API