Lindy v. McChesney
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County denying a motion to retax and apportion costs. Edward I. J ones, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
McFARLAND, J.—
This is a proceeding under section 1664 of the 'Code of Civil Procedure, to ascertain and declare the rights of all persons claiming as distributees of the estate of George M. Hasson, deceased. The appeal here is by Mary E. Mann from an order denying her motion to strike out from a bill of costs filed by the respondents certain charges for taking depositions, which were not used at the trial, and “to apportion the costs” in the proceeding “in accordance with the provisions” of said section 1664.
The record on the present appeal is very meager, and shows nothing as to the nature…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mann v. McChesneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Simpson v. GillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Welch v. AlcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- White v. FryeArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Ream v. BarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.