Irwin v. Newby
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.
In this action .defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint was sustained. A judgment of dismissal followed, and the plaintiff has appealed. The action was for libel. The main point of the demurrer was that the complaint showed upon its face that the alleged defamatory matter was privileged under the provisions of subdivision 2 of section 47 of the Civil Code, which makes a publication privileged if made in a judicial proceeding. It appears from the face of the complaint that the alleged libelous matter was published in the allegations of a cross-complaint filed by the respondent B. C.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stevens v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Carpenter v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Smith v. McDermottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- The Hale Company v. LeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Reid v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Thornton v. RhodenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Saroyan v. BurkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Frisk v. MerrihewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.