Legal Opinion

City of Downey v. Gonzales

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1968No. Civ. 31295Published

1Opinion of the Court

262 Cal.App.2d 563 (1968)

CITY OF DOWNEY, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JOSEV GONZALES et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Civ. No. 31295.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Five.

May 28, 1968.

Phill Silver and Manuel Ruiz for Defendants and Appellants.

Royal M. Sorensen, City Attorney, Burke, Williams & Sorensen and Carl K. Newton for Plaintiff and Respondent.

STEPHENS, J.

This appeal arises from an order for costs after judgments in an action in eminent domain brought by the City of Downey for the purpose of building a municipal hospital. Under one complaint, multiple parcels were sought…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Simms v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API