Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Ruelas
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 20, 2007No. B191655PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Respondents Stanley Hernandez and Isabel Hernandez (hereinafter sometimes collectively the Hernandezes) filed an action seeking to quiet title to a condominium in which they reside. Michelle Ruelas (not a party to this appeal) and appellant Rafael Ruelas were named defendants in the action. The trial court held for the Hernandezes after a bench trial. Rafael Ruelas appeals from the judgment, which we affirm.
FACTS
Michelle Ruelas is the Hernandezes' daughter; she married appellant in 1997 and they were separated in 2002.
In March 1996 the Hernandezes entered into a lease with Kathleen…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Stone v. LobsienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Yeboah v. Progeny Ventures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ciprari v. Ciprari (In re Ciprari), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- CHAPALA MANAGEMENT CORP. v. StantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Assn. of Irritated Residents v. Kern County Board etc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Conservatorship of O.B.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Conservatorship of O.B.California Supreme Court · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.