Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 9, 1987No. B019439PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, J. *
In this case, we affirm the judgment of the trial court declaring a resulting trust on certain real property. We reject the appellant’s contention that relief should be denied because of a misuse of the GI loan provisions of the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944 (38 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq.; hereinafter, Act).
Factual Background
This case was tried to the court, which issued a statement of decision in which its findings are stated in detail. In reviewing the trial court’s decision, we must “accept as true all evidence tending to establish the correctness of the finding as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hirsch v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Siegel v. Boston (In Re Sale Guaranty Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- In Re Marriage of RuelasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Leeks v. LeeksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Rollins v. Neilson (In Re Cedar Funding, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.