Bollar v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Stadtfeld, J.,
This is an appeal by plaintiff appellant from an order of judgment non obstante veredicto for defendant where a verdict was rendered by a jury in favor of plaintiff in an action of trespass for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while a passenger in a street car operated by defendant company.
The facts are correctly stated in the opinion of the court below (McBride, J.) from which we quote: “The plaintiff, a Baptist minister, was at the time of the trial ninety years of age. On the afternoon of February 2, 1941, he and two other ministers were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith Et Ux. v. Pittsburghi Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Staller v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Endicott v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- McClusky v. Shenango Val. Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Hufnagel v. Pittsburgh Rwys. Co., Etc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Connolly v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Schilling v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Smith v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Miller v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Zager v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.