Zager v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
This is an appeal from the refusal of the lower court to remove a compulsory nonsuit, and judgment entered after said refusal, in an action, wherein the minor plaintiff sued to recover for personal injuries allegedly suffered while she was a passenger in one of the defendant company’s trolley cars. Her testimony was as follows: She boarded a westbound trolley car at the intersection of Fifth Avenue and Evans Street in the City of McKeesport. The trolley started in motion and she stood, preparatory to paying her fare, holding onto the fare box with her left hand and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith Et Ux. v. Pittsburghi Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Endicott v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Herholtz Et Vir v. West Penn Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Bollar v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Cocivera v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Pribish v. Mercer County Agricultural Society, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1996
- Smith v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Smith v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961