Legal Opinion

Hufnagel v. Pittsburgh Rwys. Co., Etc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1942No. Appeal, 122PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Patteeson,

This was an action in trespass for injuries allegedly resulting from negligence in the operation of a street railway car.

Ethel I. Hufnagle, the plaintiff, testified that she boarded a street car of Pittsburgh Railways Company, entering at a door in the center of the car; that as she was walking towards the rear of the car to find a seat it started with a “very violent lurch”; that the lurch was “the most violent” she had ever encountered in riding street cars; and that she fell or was thrown to the floor of the car, sustaining injuries. At the time Miss…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith Et Ux. v. Pittsburghi Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Staller v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Endicott v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. McClusky v. Shenango Val. Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Hill v. West Penn Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Herholtz Et Vir v. West Penn Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Meussner v. Port Authority of Allegheny CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Schilling v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Bollar v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Mervine v. Aronomink Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API