Legal Opinion

Smith Et Ux. v. Pittsburghi Rys. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1934No. Appeals, 110 and 111PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

These appeals are from judgments entered for the plaintiffs in an action brought by Ella Smith and her husband to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her while a passenger on one of defendant’s street cars. . Defendant assigns as error the refusal of its motion for judgment n. o. v.

Mrs. Smith testified that she was riding in one of defendant’s one-man trolleys; that as the car approached her stop, going down grade, she signalled the motorman, and the car slowed down; that she then went to the front of the car, took hold of a strap…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sanson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Tilton v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Kleine v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. McClusky v. Shenango Val. Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Bliss v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Staller v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Endicott v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Wilcoxen v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Herholtz Et Vir v. West Penn Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Keller v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API