Legal Opinion

Cairns v. Cairns

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 2010No. A125736PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DONDERO, J.

In a proceeding on a probate petition filed by the trustees of a testamentary trust, the court interpreted a provision—known as the “five-or-five” provision—for annual distribution of principal to a life beneficiary, and found that the provision authorized the distribution to include an interest in real property in addition to money. In this appeal, a remainder beneficiary argues that the trial court’s interpretation of the trust document was erroneous, and complains that he was improperly denied an evidentiary hearing. We conclude that the trial court’s interpretation of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. City of Atascadero v. Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Salmonski v. BardzinskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Susag v. City of Lake ForestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Ike v. DoolittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Atempa v. Pedrazzani, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Trolan v. Trolan, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Estate of O'Connor v. O'Connor, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Ammerman v. CallenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. (HC) Baca v. RobertsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API