Crocker v. Page
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
McCann, J.:
Plaintiff was in possession of certain property of defendants under a three-year lease expiring April 30, 1923, and containing an option to purchase at any time during its term for the sum of $8,750.
It is claimed by the defendants that the plaintiff waived the option provision or is estopped from asserting it. The plaintiff is trying to enforce it in an action for specific performance. The trial court dismissed the complaint. There is conflict of testimony as to just what took.place in the conversations between the plaintiff *736and the defendants prior to the execution by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Imperator Realty Co. v. . TullNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Ripley v. . the &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Epstein v. . GluckinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- New York Rubber Co. v. RotheryNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Reilly v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kaplan v. LippmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. De Wald Radio Mfg. Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
- Sargent v. HalseyNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Brook Iron Works, Inc. v. CohenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930
- Kukoff v. MussNew York Supreme Court · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.