Kukoff v. Muss
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.
This action is brought to compel specific performance of a contract to purchase stock in Connecticut Brick, Inc., a “ closed corporation ”, which the complaint alleges has no marketability in the open market and is of value only to the parties interested in the corporation. The only stockholders of the corporation prior to the execution of the contract were the defendant, the plaintiff and the latter’s sons (who assigned their rights under the contract to the plaintiff).
Plaintiff alleges due performance of all of the terms of the contract, a copy of which it attached to the complaint. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Epstein v. . GluckinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Agar v. OrdaNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Langel v. BetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Terner v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Catholic Foreign Mission Society of America v. OussaniNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Silverman v. Alcoa Plaza AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971