Legal Opinion
Brook Iron Works, Inc. v. Cohen
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided November 24, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
The plaintiff sues upon two causes of action, the first based upon a written contract, and the second upon an oral one. This written contract, the subject of the first cause of action, results from a written proposal of the plaintiff to the defendant, dated April 5, 1929, which proposal he accepted by a letter dated April 15, 1929, and concerns the sale by the plaintiff to the defendant of 403 lineal feet of fence, described as “ Habitant White Cedar Fencing,” identified as design No. 1225, Lenox style, to be erected by plaintiff upon the premises of the defendant, for a price of $778. The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- McCreery v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Martin v. PeytonNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Lieberman v. . Templar Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Winter v. . American Aniline Products, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brook Iron Works, Inc. v. CohenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1931