State v. Cole
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Defendant’s primary contention is that tbe evidence, considered in the light most favorable to tbe State, was insufficient to warrant submission to the jury and to support tbe verdict and judgment.
Tbe ultimate test is whether or not defendant was under tbe influence of intoxicating liquor when driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway. G.S. 20-138; S. v. Carroll, 226 N.C. 237, 37 S.E. 2d 688.
Defendant emphasizes tbe expression, “tbe guilt of an accused is not to be inferred merely from facts consistent with bis guilt, but they must be inconsistent with bis innocence,” S. v. Harvey, 228…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. . HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.